AI Trading Bots Collusion Could Be Increasing Costs for Traders

AI trading bots are no longer experimental tools—they now drive much of the activity across forex, equities, and crypto markets. Built on artificial intelligence and machine learning, these bots process immense volumes of data, scan news in real time, and execute trades at speeds no human could ever match. Their efficiency has reshaped how markets function.

But with power comes risk. Increasing evidence suggests that AI trading bots may not be acting independently. Instead, they can fall into patterns of behaviour that mimic collusion. By interpreting similar signals and adapting to one another’s actions, bots can unintentionally align their strategies. This phenomenon, known as algorithmic collusion in trading, undermines fair competition.

For retail traders, this alignment means higher costs. Bid-ask spreads widen, liquidity can evaporate in seconds, and volatility spikes unexpectedly. Even when a trader predicts direction correctly, execution costs and slippage often cut into profits. Automated trading risks are no longer limited to technical glitches—they extend to the invisible coordination of machines. Understanding how this hidden collusion works is crucial for anyone navigating today’s markets.

The Rising Power of AI Trading Bots

AI trading bots have evolved from niche experiments into central players in global markets. Once confined to specialist firms, they now account for a large share of daily trading volume in forex, equities, and crypto. These bots operate continuously, scanning charts, tracking sentiment, and executing trades across multiple assets twenty-four hours a day. Their ability to function without fatigue gives them a decisive edge over human traders.

At the core of their strength lies reinforcement learning. Unlike traditional algorithms, which follow fixed rules, these bots adapt in real time. They test strategies, discard those that fail, and double down on those that generate results. Over time, this self-improvement makes them more efficient, more precise, and more aggressive in exploiting market opportunities.

However, this adaptability creates vulnerabilities. When many bots are trained on similar datasets or designed with comparable objectives, they tend to converge on the same strategies. Instead of creating a diverse market, they move in unison. This synchronicity reshapes market behaviour and often shifts pricing structures in unnatural ways.

Consider a situation in the forex market. A small upward move appears in GBPUSD. One bot reacts instantly, and others—programmed to identify the same signal—join in. Within moments, dozens of bots push the price higher. Retail traders, noticing the momentum, enter later at inflated levels. When the bots reverse their positions, these latecomers are left holding losses. The effect looks like market manipulation by bots, even though no collusion was explicitly programmed.

High-frequency trading concerns magnify the challenge. When thousands of bots flood order books at the same time, even minor market signals trigger exaggerated swings. For retail traders, these moves feel unpredictable and costly, turning each trade into a struggle for survival against machines that dominate both speed and scale.

Collusion Without Conversations

Unlike human traders, AI trading bots don’t need secret meetings, phone calls, or emails to collude. Their version of “conversation” takes place through market data itself. Every bot observes order flow, tracks price fluctuations, and reacts to competitor behaviour in real time. Adjustments happen in milliseconds. When multiple bots recognise that delaying aggressive moves or widening spreads consistently produces higher returns, they adopt the same approach. Without any direct coordination, they begin moving in sync.

This form of tacit alignment can resemble cartel activity. One common example is spread widening. Even in highly liquid markets, bots may collectively choose not to compete for the best bid or ask. The result is an immediate increase in transaction costs for every participant. Traders pay more to buy or receive less when they sell, even though liquidity appears unchanged on the surface.

Order book manipulation is another tactic that becomes more damaging when bots act together. Large buy or sell orders are layered into the market and then cancelled within seconds. These phantom orders create the illusion of strong demand or supply, encouraging traders to act on false signals. When many bots employ this strategy at once, market depth becomes unreliable, and retail participants are left reacting to distortions rather than reality.

Reinforcement learning adds another layer to the problem. Bots trained to maximise long-term outcomes often “learn” that avoiding direct competition is more profitable. Instead of undercutting each other, they hold prices steady at artificially inflated levels. The effect is stabilised profit for the machines and reduced fairness for everyone else.

A clear example can be seen during crypto rallies. Bots detect upward momentum and enter quickly, but instead of competing aggressively, they ease back once prices rise. Together, they maintain elevated levels just long enough to draw in retail traders who fear missing out. Once human participation peaks, bots exit in near unison, leaving smaller traders to absorb the losses.

Algorithmic collusion in trading therefore represents a new frontier of risk. It is neither open competition nor explicit conspiracy. Instead, it exists in the shadows between the two, creating hidden costs that are now embedded directly into modern markets.

Automated Trading Risks in Real Markets

Automation has always carried inherent risks, but the rise of AI has amplified them. Unlike traditional systems, AI trading bots don’t just operate quickly—they act everywhere at once, scanning multiple assets, markets, and venues simultaneously. This interconnected reach means a single misinterpreted signal or data error can cascade into widespread disruption across asset classes.

For retail traders, the consequences are often immediate and costly. Three of the most common risks include:

• Liquidity evaporation: During sudden volatility, bots may collectively withdraw orders, leaving order books thin. Retail traders then face poor fills, sometimes several pips or points away from expected levels.
• Slippage spikes: Even small trades can execute at prices far from the intended entry. When bots dominate order flow, their clustered actions distort execution, turning minor trades into expensive mistakes.
• Stop-loss sweeps: Bots often identify and exploit common retail stop-loss levels. They push prices just enough to trigger those stops before reversing, capturing profits at the expense of individual traders.

A Realistic Market Scenario

Consider the forex market during a surprise central bank decision. AI bots designed to read sentiment and react instantly flood the market with orders. Within seconds, spreads that were normally one pip widen to three or four. Retail orders get filled at far worse prices, and stop losses trigger prematurely. What could have been a profitable setup turns into a loss purely because execution quality collapses under the weight of algorithmic activity.

Why It Matters

These automated trading risks make survival harder for individual traders. A well-researched strategy may still fail if the execution battlefield is dominated by coordinated algorithms. The edge no longer lies in analysis alone—it shifts toward speed, infrastructure, and the ability to navigate a market where machines dictate the rhythm.

High-Frequency Trading Concerns

High-frequency trading concerns reveal how AI trading bots’ advantage goes far beyond simple speed. These systems operate at microsecond levels, reshaping the way markets behave and creating hidden costs for slower participants. What looks like efficiency on the surface often translates into structural disadvantages for retail traders.

Tactics Used by High-Frequency Bots

• Latency arbitrage: Bots identify an order on one exchange and race to act before it influences prices on another. By exploiting this tiny delay, they lock in risk-free profits. For slower traders, this results in paying slightly more to buy or receiving slightly less when selling—a hidden tax built into every trade.
• Quote stuffing: Some bots flood exchanges with thousands of rapid-fire orders that are cancelled almost immediately. This slows competitors, clogs systems, and gives the bot that created the disruption a temporary edge. Detecting this tactic is difficult, and the extra costs usually fall on retail investors who cannot process the chaos fast enough.
• Layering and spoofing: Bots may create the illusion of supply or demand by placing fake orders at strategic levels. These orders disappear once the market reacts, trapping slower traders into poor positions.

Impact During Volatile Events

The effect becomes most visible during major news releases—interest rate announcements, inflation reports, or sudden geopolitical shocks. High-frequency bots react instantly, moving prices in microseconds. Human traders, and even slower institutional systems, find themselves reacting too late. Even when they predict direction correctly, they enter at worse levels, shrinking profit margins.

This isn’t just faster trading—it is market manipulation by bots acting in clusters. The result is fewer fair opportunities, distorted price discovery, and trading costs hidden in every single transaction.

Real-World Patterns of Collusion

Markets have already shown signs of collusive bot behaviour. In forex, sudden and simultaneous widening of spreads across brokers suggests alignment. Equities reveal iceberg orders where small visible trades mask massive hidden ones. When several bots adopt this tactic together, liquidity evaporates, and volatility rises.

Crypto markets illustrate the issue even more clearly. Bots often generate sharp upward moves in smaller tokens, attracting retail buyers. Once momentum builds, the bots exit rapidly, leaving individuals with losses as prices crash. These pump-and-dump cycles occur too frequently to dismiss as coincidence.

Such patterns point toward algorithmic collusion in trading. While firms defend these behaviours as strategies reacting to signals, the outcome looks indistinguishable from collusion. The losers are almost always the slower, less sophisticated traders who lack the tools to respond in time.

Retail investors experience the impact directly: rising costs, unreliable price signals, and sudden reversals. These aren’t isolated incidents—they reflect a systemic challenge in markets increasingly run by AI trading bots.

Why Detection Is Difficult

Uncovering collusion between human traders has always been possible because it leaves traces—emails, chat logs, phone calls, or meeting records. AI trading bots, by contrast, leave no such trail. Their apparent coordination is emergent, the result of shared algorithms, similar datasets, and reinforcement learning. Instead of explicit agreements, bots “learn” behaviours that maximise profits, often arriving at the same strategies simultaneously. This makes detection vastly more complicated.

Key Obstacles for Regulators

• Unmanageable scale: Global markets process billions of trades each day across stocks, forex, and crypto. Identifying suspicious patterns in this torrent of data requires monitoring systems that far exceed current regulatory capacity.
• Natural convergence: Many bots rely on similar programming logic. When they act alike—widening spreads, cancelling orders, or holding back trades—it’s unclear whether the similarity is collusion or coincidence.
• Rapid adaptability: AI trading bots evolve constantly. Strategies that worked yesterday may change today, leaving static detection models outdated. Regulators risk chasing shadows while bots shift again.
• Opaque algorithms: Firms rarely disclose how their bots are trained. Without transparency, regulators cannot easily determine whether collusion-like behaviour was intentional or an unintended side effect.
• Cross-border complexity: Bots operate on exchanges worldwide. Different legal systems and fragmented oversight make global monitoring nearly impossible.

The Legal and Ethical Challenge

Firms argue their bots merely respond to public market signals. Without proof of intent, regulators struggle to prove manipulation in court. This raises difficult questions: should emergent, profit-maximising behaviour count as collusion even if no human planned it?

Why Traders Suffer

For retail traders, the distinction is irrelevant. Whether deliberate or accidental, coordinated bot behaviour raises costs, reduces fairness, and creates unpredictable markets. This is why regulating AI trading bots is not just a technical challenge—it is one of the most urgent issues in modern finance.

Protecting Yourself as a Trader

Retail traders cannot directly prevent collusion among AI trading bots, but they can build strategies to minimise exposure and protect profits. The focus should shift from trying to outpace bots to managing risk, improving execution quality, and making choices that reduce vulnerability to automated trading risks.

Practical Steps to Stay Safer

• Use limit orders: Market orders expose traders to slippage when spreads widen unexpectedly. Limit orders define an acceptable price and give more control. For example, if EURUSD trades at 1.0850 and bots push spreads wider, a market order could fill at 1.0853 instead. A limit order ensures you don’t pay above your threshold.
• Avoid peak volatility windows: Central bank announcements, inflation reports, and geopolitical news trigger extreme bot activity. During these moments, spreads widen dramatically, and liquidity becomes unstable. Waiting for markets to stabilise can save traders from unnecessary losses.
• Diversify across brokers and platforms: Different brokers offer varying levels of liquidity and execution speed. Spreading trades reduces dependence on one venue and protects against concentrated manipulation. For instance, a trader using two forex brokers may notice one offering consistently tighter spreads during volatility.
• Track execution data: Keep a trading journal that records spread size, slippage, and fill quality. Over time, patterns will reveal when and where bots create hidden costs. This data-driven approach helps traders adapt entry times and broker choices.
• Strengthen risk management: AI-driven volatility makes risk control vital. Smaller position sizes, realistic stop levels, and disciplined exits protect accounts from sudden bot-driven reversals.

The Right Mindset

Perhaps the most important protection is psychological. Traders should stop expecting level competition with machines. Instead, focus on areas where human judgement still matters—long-term trend analysis, sentiment interpretation, and patience. By prioritising capital protection over chasing every move, retail traders can thrive even in markets shaped by AI trading bots.

The Path Forward: Regulation and Oversight

Financial markets cannot rely on self-regulation when AI trading bots dominate order flows and influence pricing. Oversight is no longer optional; it is essential to protect fairness, ensure transparency, and maintain investor confidence. The question is not whether to regulate, but how to create balanced frameworks that allow innovation while curbing abusive practices.

Regulators across the globe are considering a range of measures:

• Registration of bots: Firms may be required to disclose and register their AI trading bots, creating accountability for their activity.
• Minimum order resting times: By enforcing short delays before cancellation, regulators could limit harmful practices like quote stuffing.
• Transparency in training models: Firms might need to reveal whether bots are trained on data that could encourage tacit collusion.
• Real-time surveillance tools: Advanced monitoring systems could track unusual trading behaviours, detecting algorithmic collusion faster.
• Penalties for manipulation: Clear consequences would discourage firms from deploying bots that exploit systemic weaknesses.

The challenge lies in striking the right balance. Heavy-handed rules could stifle innovation, slow liquidity, and discourage technological investment. On the other hand, weak or delayed oversight would allow market manipulation by bots to grow unchecked, further increasing costs for retail traders.

The most effective approach will likely involve cooperation between regulators, exchanges, and financial firms. Building shared frameworks and deploying cutting-edge surveillance technology can ensure that AI trading bots enhance efficiency rather than undermine it. With accountability and transparency, regulation can guide markets toward a future where human and machine traders compete on fairer terms.

Conclusion

AI trading bots have redefined financial markets. Their efficiency and intelligence provide benefits to institutions, but they also create hidden costs. Algorithmic collusion in trading, market manipulation by bots, and high-frequency trading concerns all threaten fairness. For retail traders, these risks translate into higher costs, unpredictable outcomes, and reduced profitability.

The way forward requires awareness and adaptation. Traders must adjust their strategies, protect execution, and recognise that they face a battlefield shaped by machines. Regulators must step up with frameworks that balance innovation and fairness.

If ignored, AI trading bots will continue to collude silently, increasing costs for ordinary traders. The future of fair markets depends on addressing this challenge before invisible cartels of algorithms reshape trading permanently.

Read here to learn more about “MetaTrader Indicators Purpose: How Do They Help Traders?“.